Hypocricy Is The Prime Evil Of Monsters
November 7th 2025
The root of all evil is faith in ones rationalization of hypocritical action. Sustained faith in hypocrisy is how one transforms from man to monster.
Faith = The belief one is right or an idea is true or valid, not based upon reason, evidence, facts or proof, but feeling, culture, tradition and conditioning.
✅ I. THE OBJECTIVE DEFINITION OF HYPOCRISY (Formalized)
Hypocrisy is the intentional application of contradictory moral standards: claiming a right while denying that right to others in equivalent circumstances, without justifiable distinction.
In even tighter form:
Hypocrisy = a self-contradiction in moral claims.
Self-contradiction = destruction of reason.
Destruction of reason = destruction of life.
This makes hypocrisy not only wrong but metaphysically anti-life.
The “prime evil” status for hypocrisy can be justified logically:
✅ Hypocrisy is evil because:
It destroys the universality of rights.
If one may lie, steal, coerce, and call it “right for me but wrong for you,” then rights no longer exist as principles — only as privileges.It destroys the law of identity.
The hypocrite demands:
A = A when applied to others
A ≠ A when applied to me.
This is a metaphysical contradiction, and contradictions annihilate reason.It destroys the golden rule of equity.
The hypocrite expects to be treated with fairness, honesty, respect, and liberty while refusing to treat others likewise.It creates a world in which the hypocrite himself cannot live rationally.
A world without principled rights is unpredictable and unstable.
Even if he benefits now, he undermines the foundation he needs for future flourishing.Hypocrisy is a lie about reality.
The hypocrite knows (at least implicitly) that he would not accept his own behavior if directed at him.
He denies this knowledge to justify harm.
This creates a contradiction between:
What he knows is right universally, and
What he grants himself permission to do personally.
This is the precise mechanism by which hypocrisy becomes the root of all evil.
✅ II. WHY HYPOCRISY IS WRONG EVEN IF ONE “GETS AWAY WITH IT”
1. Short-term benefit ≠ long-term good
Even tyrants who prosper materially live in:
perpetual fear,
dependence on lies,
the need for threat, coercion, or manipulation,
the destruction of trust,
the impossibility of genuine love, friendship, or admiration.
They gain stolen values, which provide stolen pleasure, which has no long-term sustainability.
2. Hypocrisy destroys the conditions required for value itself
Values require:
stability
predictability
cooperation
trust
communication
justice
rational expectations
Hypocrisy erodes all of these. If hypocrisy were universalized, society would collapse into pure force — which would destroy even the hypocrite.
3. The hypocrite’s “benefits” are illusory
They obtain:
pseudo-prestige
pseudo-wealth
pseudo-respect
pseudo-security
All dependent on maintaining the lie.
They cannot obtain:
pride
self-esteem
genuine admiration
rational joy
long-term safety
value from their character
objective fulfillment
This is why their gains “work” only superficially, never metaphysically.
4. Hypocrisy relies on the honesty of others
A thief depends on the existence of producers.
A liar depends on the existence of the truthful.
A dictator depends on productive subjects.
A corrupt person depends on the existence of the incorruptible.
Hypocrisy is parasitism.
If everyone were like him, he could not survive.
That is an objective contradiction.
✅ III. FORMAL PRINCIPLE: THE LAW OF UNIVERSALITY
A moral principle is only valid if it can be applied universally to all humans with the same nature.
If a principle cannot be universalized, it is not a principle.
If a right cannot be extended equally, it is not a right.
If a behavior destroys rights when multiplied, it is evil.
This is the structural basis for why hypocrisy = self-evident evil.
✅ IV. FORMALIZING HYPOCRISY AS THE PRIME EVIL
Life requires reason.
→ Reason requires logic.
→ Logic requires non-contradiction.
→ Non-contradiction requires consistent standards.
→ Consistent standards require universal rights.
→ Universal rights require rejecting hypocrisy.
Thus:
Hypocrisy is the rejection of universality, contradiction of logic, abandonment of reason, and thus the root attack on life itself.
The Law of Universality:
A moral claim is valid only if you would accept it applied to yourself under identical circumstances.
Why is hypocrisy wrong if someone can be evil and benefit from it for an entire lifetime?
Because hypocrisy:
contradicts reason
destroys the universal conditions required for life
is parasitic on the virtues of others
relies on contradictions that cannot be sustained metaphysically
collapses when universalized
undermines the long-term flourishing of the actor
poisons the actor’s cognition, character, and self-concept
creates a world in which they cannot live rationally
makes them dependent on deception to experience any value
corrupts their ability to maintain or deserve joy, trust, love, or pride
A person can survive as a hypocrite.
But a person cannot flourish, actualize, be fulfilled, or achieve happiness as a hypocrite.
In your system where happiness is the purpose of life, this makes hypocrisy:
The prime metaphysical self-destruction.
The seed of corruption.
The root of evil.
WHAT THE PRINCIPLE OF UNIVERSALITY IS
In ethics, universality means:
A moral principle is only valid if it applies equally to all beings of the same nature in equivalent circumstances.
Simplified:
If it’s right for me in a situation, it’s right for you in the same situation.
This immediately kills:
hypocrisy
double standards
moral relativism
caste morality
“rules for thee but not for me” thinking
It enforces rational consistency.
✅ WHY UNIVERSALITY IS NATURALLY COMPATIBLE WITH MY SYSTEM
My system says:
humans share a nature (reason, free will, sovereignty)
morality must respect that nature
rights describe the necessary conditions for flourishing
contradictions are anti-life
hypocrisy is applying contradictions to ethics
Thus:
If humans are the same in nature, then their moral rights must be the same where relevant.
That’s universality.
Objectivism grounds morality in life, not in logical symmetry.
Objectivists insist:
morality is derived from the requirements of human life
not from logical rules like “act only in a way that you want everyone to act”
Thus they resist any formulation that appears to place logic above life.
✅ HOW TO FORMULATE UNIVERSALITY IN A NON-CONTRADICTORY WAY
✅ The Universal Principle of Non-Contradiction in Rights
A moral right or moral action is valid only if it is consistent with human nature and can be applied to all humans in equivalent circumstances without contradiction to the requirements of life.
This satisfies all criteria:
✅ universalizable (no hypocrisy)
✅ non-contradictory (Objectivist logic)
✅ grounded in life, not duty (Objectivist ethics)
✅ context sensitive (no Kantian rigidity)
✅ individual-oriented (emphasis on sovereignty)
It also clarifies the logic behind rights:
A right must be universal because a right is not a privilege.
If only some people possess a moral permission, it is not a right — it is a power imbalance.
✅ OBJECTIONS TO UNIVERSALITY AND HOW TO ANSWER THEM
✅ 1. “But contexts differ. Isn’t universality too rigid?”
Answer:
Universality applies to principles, not automatic actions.
The principle is universal; the application is contextual.
Example:
“Initiating force is wrong” — universal
“Using force in self-defense is right” — contextual application
✅ 2. “What about different capacities (children, mentally disabled, drunk, insane)?”
Answer:
Universality applies to beings of the same nature and capacity.
children lack capacity
the severely mentally impaired lack capacity
those under duress have altered responsibility
Thus universality = equal treatment for equal beings, NOT identical treatment for unequals.
✅ 3. “Does universality imply altruism or self-sacrifice?”
Answer:
No.
Universality is about consistency of rights, not distribution of outcomes.
You can keep your wealth.
You can live for your own sake.
You can defend yourself.
Universality simply means:
no double standards
no privilege-based morality
no selective exemption from principles
This aligns perfectly with egoism and rational self-interest.
✅ THE BOTTOM LINE
✅ Universality is necessary for:
consistency
rationality
justice
anti-hypocrisy
rights
responsibility
moral classification
✅ It ONLY becomes dangerous when:
it is disconnected from context
it is treated as duty instead of objective need
it is applied to beings without the same capacities
it is used as a rigid Kantian imperative divorced from life
✅ I am grounding it in life, reason, and human nature.
Therefore it is not only safe — it is foundational.
WHAT IS A MONSTER?
The one who is hypocritical by principle is accepting the status of a monster by principle.
A monster is blinded by irrationality and has obliterated their capacity for genuine reason.
A monster is one who refuses to acknowledge the evil their faith based hypocrisy causes.
A monster can only exist by creating a fantasy of deception and self delusion. They must leech off reality to maintain their dreadful existence.
A monster cannot be happy, because happiness requires non contradictory standards. Happiness can not be produced via a veil of numb ignorance to reality.
Just because a monster can successfully destroy it's victims, does not make monstrosity good or right.
It simply makes them a monster.
✅ MONSTROSITY CHARACTERIZED
Hypocrisy by principle = self-chosen detachment from reality.
The “monster” is the one who not only commits evil but embraces the worldview that authorizes it.
Their happiness is impossible because contradiction and happiness are incompatible.
Success at predation does not moralize predation.
Clarifiable stages
Corruption (grey) — hypocrisy without full awareness
Evil (black) — hypocrisy with full awareness
Monstrosity (the perfected black) — hypocrisy erected into a principle
✅ A RIGOROUS DEFINITION OF “MORAL MONSTER”
A moral monster is a being who knowingly, willingly, and systematically rejects the universal standards required for human life, and instead constructs a delusional self-serving, contradictory worldview that authorizes their own predation.
Such a person:
knows the harm they cause
knows they would not accept it done to themselves
rejects reason when confronted
embraces contradiction as a weapon
turns hypocrisy into a moral principle
Once hypocrisy becomes a self-defense mechanism for evil, they lose the ability to reconnect with reality except as a tool to manipulate it.
✅ HYPOCRISY IS MONSTROUS
A moral monster is a one who deliberately rejects the universal standards of reason and equity that make human life possible.
They refuse to acknowledge the unjustifiable harm their contradictions inflict on others — because admitting it would collapse the fantasy world that sustains their self-delusion.
Such a being must feed off reality while denying the very principles that make reality intelligible.
They cannot experience genuine happiness, because happiness requires rational integrity; contradiction can produce only numbness, rage, or temporary thrills of domination.
Their ability to destroy their victims does not sanctify their actions.
It merely confirms what they have chosen to become.
1. The Principle of Universality
Monsters violate it consciously.
2. The Law of Non-Contradiction
Monsters knowingly operate on contradictions.
3. The corruption–evil–monstrosity hierarchy
My system places “monster” as the terminal stage of corruption, where hypocrisy becomes:
defended
justified
preached
weaponized