Mind Mastery

You can watch a video explanation about community protection here. It is recommended to read this page and to watch the video for a more thorough grasp on the topic.

There will always be crime and criminals.

That what we’ve always been told.

Yeah, right, of course that's what criminals running the country who profit from crime would say.

We've been convinced that we need to arm a huge gang, give them total authority over us, take away our freedoms and instill fear so then we can be protected from gangs, people who try to control us and those who wish to instill fear.

Seems logical, right?

If we wish to be protected from people causing crimes, why do we legitimise the biggest and most heavily armed gang to commit crimes against us?

If we want peace and stability, why do we vote for the worst of the worst to rule us?

We literally couldn't do a poorer job of organising ourselves into some form of cohesion.

When it comes to crime on the beginner end of the scale, there are petty thieves and amateur criminals like carjackers, burglars, murders and rapists.

These people most often work alone or in small groups and have a very small impact.

It’s when crime becomes legitimised and legal that it starts to increase in scale, dramatically.

Legality is 99% of the time a complex cover up for crime being committed by professionals.

If you were simply being honest and ethical, there is no need for legality.

Just because something is legal, does not make not make it right, just because something is illegal does not make it wrong.

How can it be legal and somehow morally acceptable to grow and smoke marijuana in one geographical location and then when you step over an imaginary line 1 metre away it now becomes illegal and wrong.

The same can be said for too many things to count. Try think about it now and see how many discrepancy's legality creates from place to place in your own country, grab a pen and a 64 page notebook, you’ll need it.

Legality is illogical and plain stupid.

It’s not law and it’s definitely not Lore.

Whatever is right remains right, regardless of state, country, world, universe or dimension of reality you exist or don't exist in.

Right is always right and wrong is always wrong.

You could call this an omniversal constant, omniverse being the word that contains all of reality/s.

To understand this in greater depth, learn more about morality.

What makes professional crime so bad is that many people believe in the authority of the most powerful gang and often actively support their criminal escapades.

Every time a police officer pulls you over without just cause, without a valid reason, they are committing a crime.

For the record, a valid reason for anyone to pull you over, not just police, would be if you had hurt someone, had intentions to hurt someone or very nearly hurt someone.

This is called;

Cause

Close call

Intention to cause

For example, you had hit someone crossing the road and then drove away, you had caused harm or a situation.

Anyone then has the right to safely attempt to pull you over, not just police.

If you could not be pulled over safely, then it’s illogical to cause more damage to try and apprehend you then and there.

For an example of a close call, you were doing donuts in front of a school and almost hit kids because you were madly spinning in circles blowing smoke everywhere.

This is obviously dangerous and an inappropriate place to do such a thing.

Anyone has the right to engage you in a peaceful manner and inform you not to behave so dangerously.

This is why skid tracks should be built in every town so hoons can have somewhere designated and safe to let off their steam.

In the case of intention to cause, if you had a mad look on your face, were sweating, making erratic movements, revving your engine, pointing and yelling at another car or person on the street, it’s quite probable that you were considering doing something dangerous.

Other people then have the right to intervene to prevent you from causing harm.

If you had not hurt someone, had no intentions and didn't come close, then why on earth would anyone believe they have the right to pull you over just because they want to?

The police only believe this nonsense because they’ve been indoctrinated to believe they are better than others and possess more rights than normal people do.

If you don’t have the right to randomly pull someone over, if your neighbour doesn't and if no one in your family has this right, then how would someone else have a right that no one else has?

You can’t allocate a right to someone else that you don’t have, it’s illogical.

Do you have the right to break into your neighbours house, beat them up and take there stuff?

Or to pull over random people to alcohol breath test them, even when they have no showed no sign of dangerous drivng?

Do you have the right to demand a fee from your neigbour because you want to improve the nature strip outfront of his property?

Of course not.

Do you have the right to tell your neighbour to turn down his music at 10pm on a Monday night?

Do you have the right to tell your neighbour to not park in your drive way?

Do you have the right to tell your neighbour to slow down on your street?

Of course you do.

This example that continues from here can be applicable to any situation which the police currently believe they have the 'lawful' right to do.

Remember throughout the example, if you don't have the right to do something, then no one else does either.

What if you and the whole street you live on took a vote and you all agreed that you should have the right to break into your neighbours house, beat them up and take there stuff, is it Ok then?

Of course not.

What if your whole town got together, formed the neighbourhood watch and the parliamentary committee for law and order, and they all voted and said that they have the right to break into your home, beat you up and take your stuff?

It’s still not Ok, is it?

How about if they did all that but then also decreed through 'law', by writing words on paper, that they have the legitimate right to violate you, because they would be acting in the best interests of the town, because they would then evenly distribute your wealth to everyone else.

Does this give them the right to break down your door, throw you to the ground and take your personal belongings?

No, it still doesn't.

Ok, if the whole town participated in the law making and voting, then they also hired some professional thugs called the neighbourhood watch law enforcers, dressed in a special uniform, wearing a shiny badge, carrying guns and working in a group, does this give legitimacy for them to rob and assault you?

No, not yet legitimate and Ok is it? One more try.

What if this parliamentary committee of law and order expanded from your town and now involved all the people in your country, they scribbled down more words on paper justifying their right to rob you, the whole country voted in favour for you to be attacked, then they changed the name of the gang of thugs to police officers and said it was because of national security they had the ethical high ground to violate you.

They would even use the excuse that you had caused incitement because you made a Facebook post about attending a peaceful rally in opposition to the molestation of innocent and peaceful men and women by the same group of thugs who attacked you.

Now, surely it must be legitimate and morally correct after all these superstitious rituals for some people to have more rights than you, don't you think?

They should be able to freely do whatever they want because everyone has agreed that it’s Ok to invade and destroy your personal freedom, right?

Well, no.

No matter how many mystical rituals they do, like wearing special uniforms, having fancy badges, sporting decorative insignia, calling themselves impressive names, waving colourful flags, writing complex laws with feather tipped ink quills on exotic aged parchment, making declarations from grand buildings or singing national songs, it simply makes no difference.

There is no amount of fanciful customs or practices that can magically make something wrong become something right.

How many people does it take to believe that something wrong can become something right?

A thousand, a million, a billion, a trillion?

Is it even possible?

If everyone in the world believed that they had the right to violate you, a peaceful and innocent man or woman, would they become right?

Or would they all be wrong?

What’s right is right and whats wrong is wrong.

You can call it gods design, or the nature of the universe or the reality of science, whatever you want to call it, the fact remains the same.

Utopian Realism is objective, meaning it is based in reality and reason.

The entire police system across the world is based on belief, not knowledge.

That's the difference between police and community protectors.

One system is based on fantasy and one on reality.

To list all the crimes that the police have committed and commit on a daily basis would be the length of a 30 book series and that would be cutting it short.

Not even mentioning the beyond professional level of crimes that the master criminal politicians, corporations, bankers and religious institutions have been not only allowed to commit, but supported and legitimised.

An amateur criminal may murder a few people or perhaps even a hundred.

A professional general in the army may murder thousands and the master level politicians and bankers can murder hundreds of thousands in seconds, simply by ordering the dropping of nuclear bombs, which has already happened, twice.

We don’t need formalised organisations to protect us from petty low level criminals.

We need formalised organisations to protect us from other formalised organisations.

The legitimised and 'authorised' police and military are the biggest threat to our sovereignty and freedom.

Not individual gangsters or lone terrorists, but organised and well armed gangs of terrorists with nuclear bombs, fighter jets and tanks at their disposal.

The police and military’s greatest asset is not their numbers or weapons armament, it’s the unhinged belief that not only do they have the right to violate, molest, attack, invade and destroy the peaceful and innocent, but that it’s an honourable and noble thing.

This mindset can only exist in the minds of those who have been severely traumatised and indoctrinated.

That’s why learning about Utopian Realism and deprogramming the evil garbage we’ve been drip fed since birth is so critical to creating a new Utopian Society where everyone can be happy, pursue their passions and thrive.

When we change our mindsets and create an effective structure for managing resources and respecting people, we’ll see the results and crime will become something from a dark and barbaric past, only remembered in history books so we can never make the same mistakes again.

We all want to feel safe and secure.

So let’s formalise a decentralised organisation based on centralised ideas to help us feel safe and secure.

We can call them community protectors.

The community protectors would be unpaid volunteers who live according to objective morality, co-operate via project specific leadership and teamwork and align with the idea of Utopia.

If you would like to learn more, you can read about Larry’s presentation in this story here.

Community protectors would be local to every town and would be able to act in an independent and individual way, not requiring hierarchy and rank to control and direct them.

They would also be able to co-cooperatively work in a team when and only when absolutely required.

They would act as a deterrent to petty thieves and professionals alike.

Anyone can volunteer to be a community protector, but must be voted into position via a peoples council meeting, to ensure the integrity of their character.

They can be voted out of the community protectors just as easily if required.

Everyone who is successfully elected to be a maintainer of peace can have an app on their phone which helps them co-ordinate.

Everyone in the town who desired can have the version of the app which they can use to call for help.

If someone is in need of immediate assistance, they can open their community protection app and call, text or send a voice memo straight away.

Similar to how a volunteer member of the CFA has a pager and can be alerted that their help is needed.

The call is directed to the closest community protector who has chosen to be on duty.

If they don’t answer, the call is directed to the next closest.

When they open their phone, they can see who is calling them and what their GPS location is.

They answer the phone and listen to the person in needs request for help.

They then decide if they need back up or can handle the situation alone.

If they don't need backup, they proceed immediately to the persons in needs location as they already have their GPS coordinates.

If they need backup, they can call, text or send a voice message to other close community protectors individually or in a group news feed style page.

The man or woman in need of assistance can easily send a text message for help in the app. 

This is useful in situations where one may need to discreetly ask for help.

Or they can just as easily, or more easily send a voice message with their details and situation asking for support.

The volunteer protectors receive a ping notification in the app, which can be set up like a news feed such as Facebook or Instagram, but only for requests of assistance. 

The protectors and towns folk alike can then see who has answered the call and how many protectors are responding to the emergency.

Every community protector can choose when they would like to be on duty and available to help or when they would like to be off duty and not receive calls.

Some protectors may not want to volunteer their aid overnight and prefer to sleep with their phone off.

Others may be happy to leave their phone on and be available to assist in situations in the middle of the night.

They have no requirement to report to a station to be on duty.

There can be a central station for community protectors to receive training and socialise, but they would not need to have their schedules set or be required to do a certain amount of hours per week.

This is because they are pure volunteers, they set their own schedules when they would like to be on and off duty.

When the community protector arrives at the scene, they do what they can to deescalate situations as peacefully as possible.

They will use their words first and for as long as required to deescalate altercations.

They will only use equal and appropriate force if absolutely necessary to handle a situation.

They will be required to wear a bodycam and record all the interactions they engage in, just in case there are disputes and for training purposes.

All community protectors will be trained in a martial arts style which teaches them to disable an opponent with the least possible damage.

They can carry weapons and equipment like rubber padded handcuffs (as they are only meant to restrain, not injure) and pistols but are only to use them if critical for the protection of life.

They will be trained to use numbers and martial arts methods to disarm and subdue violent opponents rather than weapons such as batons, tasers or pepper spray.

Using weapons against anyone is not ideal for building rapport and assisting in rehabilitation as it only causes more trauma that needs to be processed.

If someone needs to be subdued and calmed down, then community protectors work as a team to grapple that person to the ground and to hold them there, not to use chokes, restrict their breathing or by using painful arm or wrist locks.

Using painful techniques against people only makes them vengeful and more likely to commit violence again.

Proper escalation and deescalation tactics are vital for building strong and respectable relationships between not only community protectors and the people they protect, but also the people they are required to deal with.

Just like the inmates and guards at Halden prison in Norway have amenable relationships, this is what we will aim to achieve with community protectors.

We must use logical and effective strategies that prevent, deal and cure undesirable behaviour.

Not encourage more of it, as we do now in many countries.

When a community protector has dealt with someone violent, they will do everything they can to lower that persons emotions and bring them back to a stable mindset.

They will undergo the highest quality training from the best leaders in the field about de-escalation.

They then take the person who was causing trouble back to their home. Or simply calm then down and send them on their way peacefully.

If they don’t have to take them back to the station, then they shouldn't.

The only reason they would take someone back to the station to be locked in a room is if the person is extremely violent or on drugs and won’t calm down and still remains a threat.

At no other times would they ever restrain anyone by placing handcuffs on them.

If the violent person cannot be calmed down, they are escorted back to the station in comfortable restraints and locked in a humane and comfortable room.

They will have a comfortable bed, books, a bathroom, shower and access to their belongings and dignity.

It does not help to calm someone when you lock them in a cage and deprive them of their dignity by treating them worse then a zoo animal.

They would be released as soon as their behaviour is acceptable.

There is absolutely no reason to deprive someone of their freedom for a moment longer than is necessary.

If it is required, which it probably would in the rarer cases that someone needs to be contained in a room, then they would go through an arbitration process as soon as possible to determine what remedy can be utilised to correct their aberrant actions.

If they require rehab, then they would receive rehab immediately.

A long waiting time between crime being committed and curative action being taken is detrimental not only to others, but also to the one who engaged in undesirable behaviour.

We need a strategy that rectifys problems and provides solutions as fast as possible.

Our community protectors will be so professional, highly trained and well organised that police will look like total amateurs when it comes to ensuring peace and safety.

Although with that being said, the standard is extremely low so it will not be difficult at all to perform more effectively than the police force.

Considering that the police to more harm than good, we will surpass their expertise on our first day of operation.

For every problem, there is a technical solution just waiting to be implemented.

These ideas of operation can be centralised and improved upon by all sovereign towns part of the Utopian Alliance.

The decentralised nature means that no one man or small group of people can ever have command over a large number of militarised members of society.

Each community protector is a free thinker and does their personal best to ensure justice and peace is maintained.

Rank is not required in the community protectors, only skill, experience, respect, team work and peaceful co-operation. 

Leadership is also required, but leadership positions are not.

Every community protectors voice has equal right as the rest, no one is above or below the others, they all stand side by side and work together with each other and the community they protect.

Even the term ‘law enforcement’ is inappropriate.

Law or even Lore should not be enforced, it should be respected, valued and be a source of inspiration to do better and be more.

We don't want our community protectors enforcing the Lore.

We want them to be exemplary standards of peace and negotiation.

As soon as law or Lore needs to be ‘enforced’, we have failed.

Respectable behaviour should be encouraged and aspired to by a healthy mindset and an intelligent structuring of a society and it’s resources.

Enforcing law/lore obviously requires the use of force, which would go against the Lore.

Force is only required when it is an absolute last resort to protect life and prevent harm.

If force is used before then, then who ever initiated the force becomes a violator of peace and creates harm.

The term law enforcers is a term designed for dystopian societies.

Utopian societies utilise community protectors.

Who wouldn't favour protection over enforcement any day?

The police utlise a centralised command structure, which means they are very easy to be controlled from the top down and wielded as a weapon against the people.

Community protectors use a centralised set of principles, namely objective morality and have no need for a centralised command, this makes them next to impossible to become controlled and used against the people.

Very similar strategies are employed when it comes to militia.

A militia is a group of volunteers who have the ability to co-ordinate and organise to provide defence against hostile invaders.

A decentralised network of locally directed and operated volunteers dedicated to the military security of the town.

Sovereign Utopian towns can form an alliance with other Sovereign towns to co-ordinate defence from national or international invaders.

A militia is something which requires positions of leadership in specific fields.

Tactical planning and large scale strategy requires a leader to manage and implement.

On the ground leaders directing fire teams and battle strategy.

Organisers managing the logistics and resupply of ammunition and equipment.

Just like all other positions of leadership, from peoples council organisers to bridge builders to farm operators, we utilise the same strategy of project specific leadership but in the case of militia we can call it mission specific leadership.

Because war is chaotic, the militia requires slightly different strategies of organisation and leadership then everything else.

A council is formed that organises and implements decisions.

The council is formed by the leader of each specific field, such as infantry, mechanised cavalry, tank divisions, artillery, navy vessels, aircraft division, logistics and resupply etc..

Each leader of each field is elected by the entire localised militia and can be re-elected at any time, as per usual leadership and democratic standards.

The power to organise and defend against attack is managed by the council of leaders instead of by one general.

For any tactical decision, they present their ideas and vote on the best course of action.

This idea and approach is up for debate and may be modified or improved upon.

A point to remember is that these leaders and members of the militia are not full time soldiers, they are volunteers who have normal work and normal life outside of a militarised environment.

This makes them more mentally balanced, stable and less prone to military coups and outrageous war crimes.

This does not mean they are less effective.

Quite the opposite.

In a Utopian town and decentralised local militia, there is no intention to deliberately limit the quality and effectiveness of troops as is commonplace in some militaries.

Our militia will receive the best quality training that is available.

They will be equipped with the best weapon, armour and equipment that exists.

Their tactics will be second to none.

Their organisation and leadership will be unmatched.

There will be no monetary limit to restrict the quality of their training.

They will have the best of everything that the sovereign Utopian town and alliance network can build and provide for.

Whatever resources are available is what they’ll be able to utilise.

Often it’s not as important what resources you have, but on how well you can be resourceful.

Sovereign towns will not pay to buy ammunition or weapons or equipment.

We’ll build what we require from the resources we have available, from rifles, to tanks and aircraft.

Whatever we need, we’ll create a technical solution to make sure we have it.

Correct attitude, mindset, value system and leadership is what will ensure that our local militia does not turn against us and become our biggest threat.

Until the time when the entire world is a network of sovereign Utopian towns, unfortunately the militia is a necessity to ensure the safety and security of our societies.

We may one day be able to disband the militia, we may not be able to.

Only time will tell.

Until then, we will create the most effective decentralised local militia we can.

Volunteers can train as often or as little as they like.

To become part of the community protectors or towns militia, each member will be required to pass a psychological test, character test, independent free will test, morality test and whatever the town decides is necessary for someone to have access to dangerous weapons.

This same kind of process is applicable for people having access to their own private firearms and weapons.

There should be no limit to the type of weapons and armament that an individual can have.

The most important thing is their morality and ability to responsibly use those weapons.

It’s not the weapons that are dangerous, it’s the mindset of those who use them.

Some individuals already own tanks, machine guns, rocket launchers, grenades and mines and do not go killing innocents.

Yet the US military is responsible for destroying two cities and hundreds of thousands in japan with only two bombs. The war crimes of organised, authorised and command centralised militaries is enormous.

Weapons don’t kill people.

People kill people.

A weapon is an idle inanimate object until it is wielded by a human.

Weapons have always existed, exist now and will always exist.

We have to learn how to use them safely and responsibly so we don’t continue down our current path.

The more weapons in the hands of good people, the less likely bad people will use theirs.

The option to be armed or not in a Utopian town and civilisation is the choice of the individual.

In the transition, it would be reassuring for more people to carry weapons to prevent bad individuals and groups from doing bad things.

If we are to picture a World Utopian Civilisation 10 years in, it’s very unlikely anyone would actually need to carry a gun.

The aim is for people to have the freedom to carry a weapon if they choose, with the long term goal of no one needing to.

The same process for people joining the community protectors and militia will be required for people to gain access to a firearm, a psychological test, character test, independent free will test, morality test and whatever the town decides is necessary for someone to have access to dangerous weapons.

Such as safe weapons training and handling for the specific gun they want by a professional.

If people don't pass the tests, then they can try again another time.

It’s important we don’t easily provide weapons to people who are mentally unstable or of ill character.

Anyone can have a weapon and as many as they like, as long as they are mentally stable, know how to safely use their weapon and are of good character.

If we desire to build Utopian societies, we need to replace the idea of police and law enforcement with community protectors, replace the centralised military with decentralised local militia and change our attitudes towards weapons.

If we keep things the way they are, with the majority of weapons and deadly force in the hands of a few centralised organisations, we are doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past.

Let’s avoid another revolution, which just means another cycle of the same old same old.

All revolutions do is remove one dictator and replace it with another.

Because the fundamental problem has not been addressed, the root cause is still intact.

We need to rip that root out, remove the weed and start afresh.

We need to build upon a solid foundation of objectively accurate principles, otherwise we shall surely crumble, yet again.

The root cause is the belief in authority.

Not true authority, as in the idea that someone is an expert in a particular field, but pseudo authority, the idea that those with authority are superior to you and have the right to boss you around without your consent.

It’s the belief that someone has more rights than you and is better than you.

It’s the idea that someone should be giving orders and someone should be following them.

All the worlds atrocities, all of them, have been caused by this mental disease.

The belief in pseudo authority is a sickness, a mental virus, a corruption of the human psyche.

Pseudo authority does not exist, it never has and never can.

It’s one of the most destructive and devastating belief based infections that exists.

All wars, all battles, all police state violence, taxation theft and political dictatorships are because of this sickness of the mind, this false belief.

When we can overcome this parasitic mindset of authority, we can finally evolve into an intelligent and civilised species.

The last thing we need is a revolution.

We need evolution.

We must use The Sixth Utopian Principle Of Protection as our guide to make sure we end up somewhere we want to be and not where we don’t.