Mind Mastery

No human being with the potential of consciousness and the ability to inflict harm upon others has any right to empower another by offering their life in service to them, such as a religious idol, god, government or any other being or figure.

This is immoral because only one who is evil would ever desire the use of anothers life to control as their own.

This is what service is, to become a servant of another.

Helping others is an act of care.

Serving others is an act of fear.

Helping is a choice made because you want to gain something.

Serving is a choice because you are afraid to lose something.

A servant obeys their master because they fear being beaten.

A person who works in a service job fears losing their income stream and thus means for survival.

To serve another is to dishonour your true nature as it is not natural for one to unquestionably obey the orders of another.

Wars would not be fought and millions would not be killed if soldiers didn't unquestionably pledge their service to warmongers whose only intention is to use them as soul-diers.

Police brutality and police states of military occupation would be impossible if the enforcing class were not subservient to a ruling class.

A political ruling class could not exist if the political actors did not serve the banking class, the ones who fabricate the money out of thin air.

The banking class could not exist if the religious class above them did not demand service.

Up and up the acts and demands of service go, until it reaches the guy at the top who knows it’s total bullshit but uses whatever weapons he needs to steal as much power as he can.

Down and down it goes until it reaches you, the deceived fool who believes that acts of service make you a ‘good person’.

Again, helping others, being hospitable, generous and kind are totally different to ‘service’, to serve and to be a servant.

No rationally good or truly powerful being desires or needs anothers life to control as their own, as they can only morally be the master of themself.

Only parasites, the greedy, weak and corrupt require servants, slaves and obedient chattel.

The truly powerful are truly powerful, so why would they need others worship or obedience to sustain their life?

Co-operation and voluntary teamwork with others beside you is entirely different to needing others to serve beneath you.

Rationally moral and objectively good beings are happy to guide, assist, aid, support and lead others, but only evil beings desire to control others.

If one must obey another unquestionably, this is control.

Controlling others is immoral and objectively wrong.

If your partner told you what time to be home, what time to go to bed, to wake up, that you had to cook, clean, and do everything else they demanded, this is an unhealthy relationship based on control.

If your boss at work micromanaged your time at work and outside of work to the exact detail, leaving you no freedom to innovate and create new ideas to improve performance, no time to even chat to your colleagues and you were stuck in a cubicle with a precise task to perform in alignment with every minute of every hour, this this is control.

When there is control, there is the absence of care, because one who cares cannot control.

The one who gives away their life in service to another is just as evil, if not more so, then the one who takes it.

No one has the right to unquestionably obey, serve on enslave themself to another being, no matter how powerful they are, because the only beings which would desire your obedience are sure to use you as a weapon against others, therefore your act of submission is an evil one against your fellows and yourself.

To tell the difference between service and hospitableness is rather easy.

For example you’re at a restaurant or someones home and they ask you if you would like a drink, if they casually walk off and go to prepare you a drink and then bring it over, this is just basic politeness.

If they run across the room, make the drink as quickly as possible and then run back while apologising for taking so long, this is service.

Service is the act of assisting someone in a way you consider that you may be punished if you do not perform to the peak of your abilities.

To be polite and generous is to be respectful of yourself and others, treating them as you would like to be treated, which is reasonably.

If you were at a restaurant and the waiters bowed when you walked in and constantly referred to you as ‘sir’ or ‘ma’m’, then this is service and is disrespectful to you and to themselves.

All you did was walk into an establishment, why are you deserving of a bow?

Why should strangers prostrate themselves before you just because of your presence?

Why do the staff insist on calling you a title which is not your name with the implication that you have a certain superiority over them as you would not call them sir or ma’m in return?

It is unnecessary over indulgent politeness that is too much and becomes rude.

Anyone who feels special when people bow to them or call them honorific titles is only demonstrating that they lack self esteem and self respect and feel validated when others declare their inferiority as it provides them a sense of superiority and approval.

Bowing in a martial arts setting is different as you are both bowing to each other for a purpose.

Bowing on stage after a performance is an acknowledgement of your appreciation for the audiences attention and applause and is justified.

Bowing to someone you’ve never met just because they’ve walked in the door is not appropriate and is demeaning for both parties.

When someone bows to another unjustifiably and unreasonably, it is insinuating that the one receiving the bow desires such an act of submission.

This can be considered an offensive action against their character to imply that this man requires signs of obedience from servants to live his life.

Again, only the self loathing and those with no confidence in their true value desire approval and validation from others.

One who knows his worth could take it as a act of disrespect, although if he did, he should inform the bowers not to behave as so.

Utopian Realism does not advocate superiority and inferiority which is implicit in the idea of service.

Utopian Realism stands for the truth and the truth is no one should kneel before another and no one should demand another kneel before them.

To pay your tribute, to support and vote for your masters, to obey the dictates of the rulers, to spread their message that disobedience is shameful and obedience is virtuous, now this is service.

Those who partake in such rituals and behaviour are in service to a ruling class or ruler as they are behaving in an unthinking, illogical and irrational manner to please a particular person or group of people in a sycophantic way.

The masses who involve themselves in such heresy are more interested in appeasing the masters then of serving their own needs and desires.

People who choose to become servants are debasing themselves in an act of heresy for they are betraying everything which is good, righteous and rational.

They are treacherous because they are abandoning themselves in favour of ruler.

A servant cannot give service to someone who is not a ruler, dictator or tyrant.

For only a megalomaniac desires their every petty need, every mundane task and every command obeyed without hesitation.

Any healthy and rational being is happy for others to do as they please, provided they behave in accordance with morality.

A healthy man is not pleased when they approach a door and a servant opens it for them, for what is this implying?

That the healthy man is unable, incapable and too incompetent to open a door?

Now, if his hands were full or was pushing a wheel chair, then this is justified.

If he is simply walking towards a door and a servant runs over to open it for him, this is a great sign of disrespect to both parties.

It is an insult to the mans cognitive ability to perform a very simple task.

The same can be said when a servant takes ones bags when checking into a hotel.

The man was obviously able to carry the bags to the hotel, especially if it is something small like a suitcase, so why would he not be able to carry it to his room?

Does he look so unfit and unhealthy that he cannot continue to carry his own bag?

Little acts of service like this, which are acts of going above and beyond of what is expected or required, can have huge detrimental carry on effects.

When one becomes accustomed to serving, it is easy for them to continue serving and to ever decrease the amount of rational thinking they do for themselves in service to another.

To serve another is to sacrifice yourself in their name.

To serve means to treat someone else better than you would treat yourself.

Why would you ever treat someone better than you treat yourself?

You should always treat yourself with the utmost respect, care and consideration, because you are you!

To not do so is preposterous and comes from a lack of self esteem, trauma and incorrect values about your worth.

You should treat yourself very well and in turn treat others as well as you treat yourself, but not better.

A servant waits on your every move and considers your needs and comforts to be of higher value than their own.

To be in service means you don't really have a choice, it means you are obligated to perform duties and functions for another because you fear punishment.

If you have a business and help your customers, clients or patients, are you really serving them?

If you were on the other side, wouldn't you simply wanted to be treated how you would want to be treated?

If you have a personal training business and a client wants to become a body builder, but you specialise in fat loss, why would you say you can help them when you cannot?

Perhaps it is because you choose to be in service to their needs because you are actually in service to their money.

If a fitness client was always late, hardly ever showed up and didn't perform well when you trained them, yet they always paid, is it worth the disrespect and frustration simply because you are in service to their ability to pay you?

When a business forgets about the money and focuses on performing quality work, because that’s what they enjoy and are good at, then the help they give to their customer is not considered service anymore, but help.

Service in business is only considered service when the staff member or business owner is only engaging and assisting a customer because there is money involved.

If there was a situation where you had to deal with a client or customer and if you weren't getting paid, there is no way you would aid them, then this is service.

If you are a barista and make coffees for people, hopefully it is because you enjoy making coffee and are really good at it, not only because you need money.

If you do what you do purely because of money, then you are a servant to money and are in service to those who can provide you with it.

Those who are in service to something or someone by default must compromise their integrity.

This is because to serve means to do something you don't really want, but you do so because you get what you think you want, in the business case it is money.

In religious cases with gods or idols it is a ticket into heaven.

In government and ruling class cases it is validation and approval that you are being ‘a good citizen’.

In the case of the waiters and restaurant staff it is because they want to keep their job (for money) and do as they have been trained, which is to ‘be a good staff member’.

If one must betray their dignity and self respect in order to gain something, is that something really worth it?

If one must beg on their knees, cry for forgiveness, ask to be redeemed of all their sins, pledge to serve and obey without question to a religious figure or god, all so they can get their invitation card to join ‘heaven’ when they die, is this really a place they would want to go?

A true heaven would have nothing to do with pleading, begging, desperation, submission, obedience or servitude.

All those features are what you would find in hell, not heaven.

If one must relinquish all their freedoms to serve a political ruling class and have the rules of life made up for them, is this a worthy trade just to be seen as a ‘good person’?

Is it worth acquiescing and prostrating yourself to strangers in a job that gives you money? Is that a price worth paying?

All service is a fearful set of actions that are only performed because one is afraid of punishment.

The religious man or woman only serves their idol or god because they fear being ripped apart for eternity in the excruciating fires of hell.

Who wouldn’t be afraid of that if it was true? If it were true that a loving god created everything and cares, it is irrational that the god would only give you two evil options, ‘bow before me or burn in hell’.

When logic is applied rationally, one care see through the unreasonableness and falsehood in this lie.

All acts of service have been instigated through manipulating ones fears.

“The customer is always right”. Yes, only if you’re a slave to money, have no self respect and are afraid of poverty.

“They are the government, that’s what the experts are telling us and they know better, we better do what we are told.” Yes, if you fear the fines, confrontation and threats of punishment, you better do what you are told, lest you grow a conscience!

“You will do as you’re told because I’m the boss and you work for me!” Yes, you should do as your told if you’re afraid you’re so incompetent you’re unable to find a new job or start your own business, you better get on your hands and knees and beg for forgiveness, lest you want to live on the streets!

To have a job and to work are different things.

A job is something which you don’t enjoy doing and only sacrifice your time in exchange for money so you can survive.

Work is something you enjoy and are good at, that which offers value and contributes to the world.

Jobs are devoid of passion and excitement.

Work is full of passion and excitement.

If you weren't getting paid, you would have a job.

If you weren't getting paid, you would continue your work.

It is in a job that you may be coerced to sacrifice and serve.

In your work, such a thing would never happen.

You may be working in a job which does attempt to degrade you, although it’s not your work which is the problem, but the job.

Nicola Tesla was a great scientist who loved his work, although when he worked for Thomas Edison, he hated his job as he was forced to deliberately sabotage his own inventive potential in the name of Edison’s profit.

The work was great, the job was not.

If you find yourself working in a job, what are you to do?

The answer should be obvious.

Receiving money at the expense of your honour and dignity is no choice at all.

To be kind, generous, thoughtful, caring, polite and hospitable are all wonderful traits that Utopian Realism highly support and encourage.

To serve, sacrifice, plea, beg, obey and be charitable are all unworthy and dishonourable traits that have nothing to do with Utopian Realism.

To placate yourself before another is crafting your own damnation under the illusion of false promises of salvation & prosperity.

You are the only one whom you should serve, others are the only ones you should not.